IVV vs VBCG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF
Which is better, IVV or VBCG?
Large Cap Blend against Long Term Mid Quality.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | VBCG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.08% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $13M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.58% |
| Holdings | 508 | 356 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | -0.41% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Long Term Mid Quality |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 10, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs VBCG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs VBCG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCG) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a loss of 0.41% for VBCG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while VBCG charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $8 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.58% for VBCG.
Holdings Overlap
At least 2.4% of IVV's money is in holdings VBCG also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VBCG, our book for it covers 2.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and VBCG share little of their money.
11 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 14 in VBCG, against full books of 508 and 356.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in VBCG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.97% | 0.22% | 0.75% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 0.33% | 0.19% | 0.14% |
| HCAHca-the Healthcare Co | 0.10% | 0.36% | 0.26% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 0.10% | 0.32% | 0.22% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd. | 0.28% | 0.12% | 0.16% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 0.17% | 0.13% | 0.04% |
| ORealty Income Corp. | 0.09% | 0.19% | 0.10% |
| TGTTarget Corp Common Stock Usd.0833 | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.01% |
| AZOAutozone Inc Snr S* Ice | 0.07% | 0.12% | 0.05% |
| CLColgate-Palmolive Co | 0.11% | 0.07% | 0.04% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and VBCG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or VBCG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VBCG charges 0.08%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and VBCG?
At least 2.4% of IVV's money is in holdings VBCG also owns. Our book for VBCG is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 14 in VBCG.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VBCG?
IVV yields 1.06% while VBCG yields 1.58%, so VBCG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VBCG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.