IVV vs VGSR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | VGSR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.45% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $543M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 3.23% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 143 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +12.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +13.95% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -18.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vert Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 31, 2017 |
IVV vs VGSR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF (VGSR) is a ETF from Vert Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while VGSR returned +13.95%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 12.48% for VGSR.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.4% for VGSR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -18.3% for VGSR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while VGSR charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 3.23% for VGSR.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and VGSR share 22 holdings out of 626 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or VGSR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VGSR charges 0.45%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or VGSR?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +13.95% for VGSR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +11.85% for VGSR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or VGSR?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.4% for VGSR. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs VGSR -18.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and VGSR?
IVV and VGSR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and VGSR?
IVV and VGSR share 22 common holdings with a 1.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 626 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VGSR?
IVV yields 1.10% while VGSR yields 3.23%, so VGSR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.