IVV vs VIS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Vanguard Industrials ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. VIS delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | VIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $8.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.21% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 387 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +17.74% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +25.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | +20.98% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | +14.13% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 19.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -64.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 23, 2004 |
IVV vs VIS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while VIS returned +25.19%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 17.74% for VIS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +20.98% for VIS; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and +14.13% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, VIS has the edge at +9.84% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VIS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -64.9% for VIS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while VIS charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $9 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.21% for VIS.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and VIS share 78 holdings out of 810 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or VIS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VIS charges 0.09%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or VIS?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +25.19% for VIS, so VIS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +9.84% for VIS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or VIS?
VIS has been the more volatile fund at 19.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs VIS -64.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and VIS?
IVV and VIS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and VIS?
IVV and VIS share 78 common holdings with a 8.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 810 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VIS?
IVV yields 1.09% while VIS yields 1.21%, so VIS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.