SCHD vs VIS
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs Vanguard Industrials ETF
Which is better, SCHD or VIS?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, VIS over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VIS is less concentrated, with 30.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | VIS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.09% |
| AUM | $112.1B | $8.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.00% | 0.92% |
| Holdings | 103 | 399 |
| YTD Return | +23.46%Best | +7.41% |
| 1Y Return | +27.20%Best | +11.82% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.41% | +18.93%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.16% | +12.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7%Best | 17.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4%Best | -42.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,223 | $18,335Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.8% | 30.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Sep 23, 2004 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2011 to Sep 18, 2026 (14.9 years).
SCHD vs VIS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.9 years both funds cover.
SCHD vs VIS Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCHD returned +27.20% while VIS returned +11.82%. Year to date, SCHD is up 23.46% versus a gain of 7.41% for VIS.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +15.41% per year against +18.93% for VIS; over five years the annualized figures are +10.16% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VIS has the edge at +12.62% annualized vs +11.25%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VIS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 13.7% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -42.7% for VIS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while VIS charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $9 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.00% against 0.92% for VIS.
Holdings Overlap
11.7% of SCHD's money is in holdings VIS also owns. 6.6% of VIS's money is in holdings SCHD also owns.
SCHD and VIS share little of their money.
14 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 395 in VIS, against full books of 103 and 399.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 346 positions for VIS that do not appear in our book for SCHD (91.9% of the fund), and 85 for SCHD that do not appear in VIS (88.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCHD | Weight in VIS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 2.78% | 1.69% | 1.09% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 2.79% | 1.50% | 1.29% |
| UPSUnited Parcel Service, Inc | 1.90% | 1.08% | 0.82% |
| FASTFastenal Co. | 1.38% | 0.77% | 0.61% |
| PAYXPaychex, Inc. | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.47% |
| SNASnap-On Inc. | 0.49% | 0.30% | 0.19% |
| BRBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. | 0.51% | 0.25% | 0.26% |
| WSOWatsco Inc | 0.26% | 0.15% | 0.11% |
| BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. | 0.22% | 0.12% | 0.10% |
| MSMMsc Industrial Direct Co Inc | 0.13% | 0.08% | 0.05% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCHD and VIS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or VIS?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while VIS charges 0.09%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCHD or VIS?
Over the past year SCHD returned +27.20% vs +11.82% for VIS, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SCHD annualized +11.25% vs +12.62% for VIS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCHD or VIS?
VIS has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 13.7% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs VIS -42.7%.
Should I hold both SCHD and VIS?
SCHD and VIS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and VIS?
11.7% of SCHD's money is in holdings VIS also owns. 6.6% of VIS's is in holdings SCHD also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 395 in VIS.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or VIS?
SCHD yields 3.00% while VIS yields 0.92%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VIS better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, VIS over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VIS is less concentrated, with 30.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.