IVV vs WANT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WANT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.00% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $21M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.54% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 54 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | -13.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | -6.55% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +14.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | -8.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 70.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -85.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 29, 2018 |
IVV vs WANT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X ETF (WANT) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while WANT returned -6.55%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a loss of 13.16% for WANT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +14.40% for WANT; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and -8.30% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, WANT has the edge at +7.44% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WANT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 70.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -85.9% for WANT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WANT charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $100 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.54% for WANT.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and WANT share 46 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WANT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WANT charges 1.00%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or WANT?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs -6.55% for WANT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +7.44% for WANT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or WANT?
WANT has been the more volatile fund at 70.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs WANT -85.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and WANT?
IVV and WANT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WANT?
IVV and WANT share 46 common holdings with a 9.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WANT?
IVV yields 1.10% while WANT yields 0.54%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.