IVV vs WDAF
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund ETF
Which is better, IVV or WDAF?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WDAF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.45% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $20M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.12% |
| Holdings | 508 | 69 |
| YTD Return | +13.32%Best | +4.10% |
| 1Y Return | +17.08%Best | -3.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.72% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.20% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2%Best | 34.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -28.2% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,789Best | $9,778 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 62.3% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 12, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 12, 2025 to Sep 23, 2026 (1 years).
IVV vs WDAF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs WDAF Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund ETF (WDAF) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +17.08% while WDAF returned -3.34%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.32% versus a gain of 4.10% for WDAF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WDAF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.7% compared with 13.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -28.2% for WDAF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WDAF charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.12% for WDAF.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings WDAF also owns. 8.9% of WDAF's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
WDAF and IVV share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 60 in WDAF, against full books of 508 and 69.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for WDAF that do not appear in our book for IVV (0.0% of the fund), and 481 for IVV that do not appear in WDAF (98.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in WDAF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HALHalliburton Co. | 0.05% | 8.91% | 8.86% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and WDAF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WDAF?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WDAF charges 0.45%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or WDAF?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.08% vs -3.34% for WDAF, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +17.89% vs -2.22% for WDAF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or WDAF?
WDAF has been the more volatile fund at 34.7% annualized versus 13.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs WDAF -28.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and WDAF?
IVV and WDAF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WDAF?
8.9% of WDAF's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 8.9% of WDAF's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 60 in WDAF.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WDAF?
IVV yields 1.06% while WDAF yields 0.12%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WDAF better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.