IVV vs ZIG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs The Acquirers Fund ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | ZIG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $33M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.75% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 33 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | +10.77% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +9.67% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | +10.59% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | +8.31% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 20.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -37.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Acquirers Funds, LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 14, 2019 |
IVV vs ZIG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and The Acquirers Fund ETF (ZIG) is a ETF from Acquirers Funds, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% while ZIG returned +9.67%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.29% versus a gain of 10.77% for ZIG.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.19% per year against +10.59% for ZIG; over five years the annualized figures are +13.28% and +8.31% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, ZIG has the edge at +7.87% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ZIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -37.1% for ZIG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while ZIG charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.75% for ZIG.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and ZIG share 12 holdings out of 526 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or ZIG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZIG charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or ZIG?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% vs +9.67% for ZIG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IVV annualized +7.06% vs +7.87% for ZIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or ZIG?
ZIG has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs ZIG -37.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and ZIG?
IVV and ZIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and ZIG?
IVV and ZIG share 12 common holdings with a 1.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 526 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or ZIG?
IVV yields 1.10% while ZIG yields 1.75%, so ZIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.