IVVM vs QQQ
iShares Large Cap Moderate Quarterly Laddered ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVVM | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $174M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.59% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 14 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +8.71% | +18.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.58% | +25.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.06% | +25.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 28, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
IVVM vs QQQ Performance
iShares Large Cap Moderate Quarterly Laddered ETF (IVVM) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVVM returned +13.58% while QQQ returned +25.37%. Year to date, IVVM is up 8.71% versus a gain of 18.31% for QQQ.
Over three years, IVVM compounded at +14.06% per year against +25.79% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, IVVM has the edge at +13.84% annualized vs +13.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 6.7% for IVVM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.6% for IVVM and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVVM charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVVM currently yields 0.59% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
IVVM and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 106 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVVM or QQQ?
IVVM has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVVM or QQQ?
Over the past year IVVM returned +13.58% vs +25.37% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVVM annualized +13.84% vs +13.10% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVVM or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 6.7% for IVVM. Worst drawdown: IVVM -11.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both IVVM and QQQ?
IVVM and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVVM and QQQ?
IVVM and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 106 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVVM or QQQ?
IVVM yields 0.59% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so IVVM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.