IXC vs VTI
iShares Global Energy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, IXC or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IXC led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IXC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.9B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.87% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 65 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +39.40%Best | +12.30% |
| 1Y Return | +46.08%Best | +16.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.33% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +24.15%Best | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.8% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -76.1% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $29,494Best | $17,908 |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.9% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2001 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2001 to Sep 18, 2026 (24.8 years).
IXC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 24.8 years both funds cover.
IXC vs VTI Performance
iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IXC returned +46.08% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, IXC is up 39.40% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, IXC compounded at +16.33% per year against +21.01% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +24.15% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.62% annualized vs +6.52%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IXC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.8% compared with 15.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.1% for IXC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IXC charges 0.37% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $3 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IXC currently yields 2.87% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
60.7% of IXC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 3.0% of VTI's money is in holdings IXC also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
21 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in IXC and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 65 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,129 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for IXC (94.5% of the fund), and 5 for IXC that do not appear in VTI (8.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IXC | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 17.61% | 0.89% | 16.72% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 10.19% | 0.52% | 9.67% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 4.26% | 0.20% | 4.06% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 2.88% | 0.13% | 2.75% |
| VLOValero Energy | 2.81% | 0.13% | 2.68% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 2.61% | 0.12% | 2.49% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 2.42% | 0.12% | 2.30% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 2.37% | 0.10% | 2.27% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 2.04% | 0.11% | 1.93% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 1.67% | 0.08% | 1.59% |
60.7% of IXC is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IXC or VTI?
IXC has an expense ratio of 0.37% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IXC or VTI?
Over the past year IXC returned +46.08% vs +16.08% for VTI, so IXC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IXC annualized +6.52% vs +8.62% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IXC or VTI?
IXC has been the more volatile fund at 22.8% annualized versus 15.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IXC -76.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IXC and VTI?
IXC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IXC and VTI?
60.7% of IXC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 3.0% of VTI's is in holdings IXC also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in IXC and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IXC or VTI?
IXC yields 2.87% while VTI yields 1.03%, so IXC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than IXC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IXC led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.