IXP vs VTI
iShares Global Comm Services ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IXP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $471M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.47% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 90 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -2.25% | +12.74% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.73% | +20.66% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.10% | +20.69% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.32% | +11.52% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2001 | May 24, 2001 |
IXP vs VTI Performance
iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IXP returned +2.73% while VTI returned +20.66%. Year to date, IXP is down 2.25% versus a gain of 12.74% for VTI.
Over three years, IXP compounded at +21.10% per year against +20.69% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.32% and +11.52% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.06% annualized vs +3.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IXP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.1% for IXP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IXP charges 0.37% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $3 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IXP currently yields 3.47% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IXP and VTI share 22 holdings out of 2830 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IXP or VTI?
IXP has an expense ratio of 0.37% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IXP or VTI?
Over the past year IXP returned +2.73% vs +20.66% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IXP annualized +3.63% vs +8.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IXP or VTI?
IXP has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IXP -53.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IXP and VTI?
IXP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IXP and VTI?
IXP and VTI share 22 common holdings with a 8.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2830 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IXP or VTI?
IXP yields 3.47% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IXP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.