IXP vs VTI
iShares Global Comm Services ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, IXP or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IXP led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 66.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IXP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $465M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.47% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 90 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +0.02% | +13.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.54% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.76%Best | +22.30% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.64% | +12.01%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.1%Best | -56.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,134 | $17,631Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 66.1% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2001 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2001 to Sep 23, 2026 (24.9 years).
IXP vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 24.9 years both funds cover.
IXP vs VTI Performance
iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IXP returned -0.54% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, IXP is up 0.02% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, IXP compounded at +22.76% per year against +22.30% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.64% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.65% annualized vs +3.72%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IXP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 15.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.1% for IXP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IXP charges 0.37% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $3 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IXP currently yields 3.47% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
69.1% of IXP's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 8.8% of VTI's money is in holdings IXP also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
24 positions in common, counted across the 66 positions we hold weights for in IXP and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 90 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,128 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for IXP (88.7% of the fund), and 3 for IXP that do not appear in VTI (1.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IXP | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 15.95% | 1.70% | 14.25% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 11.69% | 2.90% | 8.79% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 9.32% | 2.31% | 7.01% |
| DISWalt Disney Co | 4.80% | 0.23% | 4.57% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 4.71% | 0.24% | 4.47% |
| TBBAt&t Inc | 4.62% | 0.22% | 4.40% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 4.37% | 0.42% | 3.95% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 2.43% | 0.12% | 2.31% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A | 2.16% | 0.15% | 2.01% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 2.16% | 0.10% | 2.06% |
69.1% of IXP is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IXP or VTI?
IXP has an expense ratio of 0.37% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IXP or VTI?
Over the past year IXP returned -0.54% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IXP annualized +3.72% vs +8.65% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IXP or VTI?
IXP has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 15.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IXP -53.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IXP and VTI?
IXP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IXP and VTI?
69.1% of IXP's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 8.8% of VTI's is in holdings IXP also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 66 positions we hold weights for in IXP and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IXP or VTI?
IXP yields 3.47% while VTI yields 1.03%, so IXP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than IXP?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IXP led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 66.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.