IXP vs VOO
iShares Global Comm Services ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IXP or VOO?
Each has led over a different period.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. IXP led over 3Y, VOO over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 66.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IXP | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $465M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.47% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 90 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +1.32% | +14.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.36% | +17.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.31%Best | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.16% | +13.63%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -43.9% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,499 | $18,944Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 66.1% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2001 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 22, 2026 (16 years).
IXP vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
IXP vs VOO Performance
iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IXP returned +0.36% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, IXP is up 1.32% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.
Over three years, IXP compounded at +23.31% per year against +23.04% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.16% and +13.63% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.49% annualized vs +5.71%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IXP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.9% for IXP and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IXP charges 0.37% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $3 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IXP currently yields 3.47% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
67.6% of IXP's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 9.8% of VOO's money is in holdings IXP also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
22 positions in common, counted across the 66 positions we hold weights for in IXP and 494 in VOO, against full books of 90 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 466 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for IXP (89.4% of the fund), and 5 for IXP that do not appear in VOO (2.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IXP | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 15.95% | 1.90% | 14.05% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 11.69% | 3.24% | 8.45% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 9.32% | 2.62% | 6.70% |
| DISWalt Disney Co | 4.80% | 0.26% | 4.54% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 4.71% | 0.30% | 4.41% |
| TBBAt&t Inc | 4.62% | 0.25% | 4.37% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 4.37% | 0.47% | 3.90% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 2.43% | 0.13% | 2.30% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A | 2.16% | 0.17% | 1.99% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 2.16% | 0.12% | 2.04% |
67.6% of IXP is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IXP or VOO?
IXP has an expense ratio of 0.37% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IXP or VOO?
Over the past year IXP returned +0.36% vs +17.31% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IXP annualized +5.71% vs +13.49% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IXP or VOO?
IXP has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: IXP -43.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both IXP and VOO?
IXP and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IXP and VOO?
67.6% of IXP's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 9.8% of VOO's is in holdings IXP also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 66 positions we hold weights for in IXP and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, IXP or VOO?
IXP yields 3.47% while VOO yields 1.04%, so IXP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than IXP?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. IXP led over 3Y, VOO over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 66.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.