JPRF vs VTI
JPMorgan Preferred and Income Securities ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, JPRF or VTI?
Preferred Stock against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JPRF | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.3B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 194 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -1.96% | +13.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +18.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.14% |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Preferred Stock | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
JPRF vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
JPRF vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan Preferred and Income Securities ETF (JPRF) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, JPRF is down 1.96% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JPRF charges 0.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JPRF currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 2.3% of VTI's money is in holdings JPRF also owns.
Stated as a floor: for JPRF, our book for it covers 69.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VTI and JPRF share little of their money.
14 positions in common, counted across the 121 positions we hold weights for in JPRF and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 194 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JPRF | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 1.93% | 0.37% | 1.56% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 1.47% | 0.55% | 0.92% |
| TFCTruist Financial Corp. | 1.18% | 0.09% | 1.09% |
| USBUS Bancorp | 0.78% | 0.14% | 0.64% |
| CCitigroup Inc 6.875 11/73 6.88 2173-11-15 | 0.41% | 0.30% | 0.11% |
| FITBFifth Third Bancorp | 0.62% | 0.07% | 0.55% |
| COFCapital One Financial Corp. | 0.48% | 0.18% | 0.30% |
| BKBank Of New York Mellon Corp | 0.37% | 0.15% | 0.22% |
| MTBM&T Bank Corporation 6.35 12/15/2173 6.35 2173-12-15 | 0.42% | 0.05% | 0.37% |
| CMSCms Energy Corp. | 0.41% | 0.03% | 0.38% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of JPRF and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JPRF or VTI?
JPRF has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between JPRF and VTI?
At least 2.3% of VTI's money is in holdings JPRF also owns. Our book for JPRF is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 121 positions we hold weights for in JPRF and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, JPRF or VTI?
JPRF yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than JPRF?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.