KAPR vs VOO
Innovator US Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - April vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. KAPR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KAPR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $220M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +14.06% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.21% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.80% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.33% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
KAPR vs VOO Performance
Innovator US Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KAPR returned +21.21% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, KAPR is up 14.06% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, KAPR compounded at +13.80% per year against +21.79% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.33% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs +9.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 10.1% for KAPR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.9% for KAPR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KAPR charges 0.79% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KAPR currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KAPR or VOO?
KAPR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KAPR or VOO?
Over the past year KAPR returned +21.21% vs +20.92% for VOO, so KAPR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), KAPR annualized +9.77% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KAPR or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 10.1% for KAPR. Worst drawdown: KAPR -16.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both KAPR and VOO?
KAPR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, KAPR or VOO?
KAPR yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.