KBFR vs RDTY
Innovator US Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETF vs YieldMax Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
Which is better, KBFR or RDTY?
KBFR costs less.
KBFR has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KBFR | RDTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 1.73% |
| AUM | $13M | $17M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.29% | 43.58% |
| Holdings | 1,686 | 8 |
| YTD Return | +6.54% | +15.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +14.05% |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | YieldMax ETF |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2026 | Mar 5, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
KBFR vs RDTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
KBFR vs RDTY Performance
Innovator US Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETF (KBFR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and YieldMax Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF. Year to date, KBFR is up 6.54% versus a gain of 15.02% for RDTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KBFR charges 0.79% per year while RDTY charges 1.73%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $173 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KBFR currently yields 0.29% against 43.58% for RDTY.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 749 holdings in KBFR and 1 in RDTY, totalling 87.7% and 7.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 749 positions we hold weights for in KBFR and 1 in RDTY, against full books of 1,686 and 8.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KBFR and RDTY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KBFR or RDTY?
KBFR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while RDTY charges 1.73%. KBFR is the cheaper option, by $94 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, KBFR or RDTY?
KBFR yields 0.29% while RDTY yields 43.58%, so RDTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RDTY better than KBFR?
KBFR has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.