KBFR vs VOO
Innovator US Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, KBFR or VOO?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KBFR | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.29% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 1,686 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +7.42% | +11.01%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.60% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.82% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.60% |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
KBFR vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
KBFR vs VOO Performance
Innovator US Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETF (KBFR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, KBFR is up 7.42% versus a gain of 11.01% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KBFR charges 0.79% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KBFR currently yields 0.29% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.1% of VOO's money is in holdings KBFR also owns.
Stated as a floor: for KBFR, our book for it covers 88.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 757 positions we hold weights for in KBFR and 494 in VOO, against full books of 1,686 and 509.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KBFR | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PSAPublic Storage | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KBFR and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KBFR or VOO?
KBFR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, KBFR or VOO?
KBFR yields 0.29% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than KBFR?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.