KDVD vs VOO
Keeley Dividend ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, KDVD or VOO?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
KDVD has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KDVD | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00%Best | 0.03% |
| AUM | $8M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.30% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 72 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +14.99%Best | +11.55% |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 8, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
KDVD vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
KDVD vs VOO Performance
Keeley Dividend ETF (KDVD) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, KDVD is up 14.99% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KDVD charges 0.00% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KDVD currently yields 1.30% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.0% of VOO's money is in holdings KDVD also owns.
Stated as a floor: for KDVD, our book for it covers 92.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VOO and KDVD share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 50 days apart, KDVD as of Aug 19, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
15 positions in common, counted across the 67 positions we hold weights for in KDVD and 505 in VOO, against full books of 72 and 509.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KDVD | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| QQnity Electronics | 2.01% | 0.05% | 1.96% |
| FITBFifth Third Bancorp | 1.78% | 0.08% | 1.70% |
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 1.35% | 0.49% | 0.86% |
| NLOKGen Digital Inc | 1.76% | 0.02% | 1.74% |
| SWKSSkyworks Solutions Inc. | 1.41% | 0.02% | 1.39% |
| AMPAmeriprise Financial Inc. | 1.36% | 0.06% | 1.30% |
| AMCRAmcor Plc Ordinary Shares | 1.37% | 0.03% | 1.34% |
| HASHasbro Inc. | 1.38% | 0.02% | 1.36% |
| UHSUniversal Health Services Inc. | 1.33% | 0.01% | 1.32% |
| AJGArthur J Gallagher & Co. | 1.13% | 0.09% | 1.04% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KDVD and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KDVD or VOO?
KDVD has an expense ratio of 0.00% while VOO charges 0.03%. KDVD is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between KDVD and VOO?
At least 1.0% of VOO's money is in holdings KDVD also owns. Our book for KDVD is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 67 positions we hold weights for in KDVD and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, KDVD or VOO?
KDVD yields 1.30% while VOO yields 1.04%, so KDVD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than KDVD?
KDVD has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.