KEMQ vs VOO
KraneShares Public-Private Emerging Markets Internet and Technology ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, KEMQ or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. KEMQ led over 3Y, VOO over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. KEMQ is less concentrated, with 34.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KEMQ | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $24M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 4.97% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 67 | 506 |
| YTD Return | -3.19% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.61% | +16.33%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.56%Best | +23.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.24% | +14.02%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.3% | 16.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -70.7% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,121 | $19,271Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.9%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 11, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 12, 2017 to Oct 2, 2026 (9 years).
KEMQ vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9 years both funds cover.
KEMQ vs VOO Performance
KraneShares Public-Private Emerging Markets Internet and Technology ETF (KEMQ) is an ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KEMQ returned -3.61% while VOO returned +16.33%. Year to date, KEMQ is down 3.19% versus a gain of 13.59% for VOO.
Over three years, KEMQ compounded at +24.56% per year against +23.81% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +0.24% and +14.02% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +14.15% annualized vs +1.06%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KEMQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.3% compared with 16.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.7% for KEMQ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KEMQ charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KEMQ currently yields 4.97% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 54 holdings in KEMQ and 494 in VOO, totalling 100.4% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, KEMQ as of Sep 15, 2026 and VOO as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in KEMQ and 494 in VOO, against full books of 67 and 506.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 487 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for KEMQ (99.2% of the fund), and 5 for KEMQ that do not appear in VOO (11.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KEMQ and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KEMQ or VOO?
KEMQ has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KEMQ or VOO?
Over the past year KEMQ returned -3.61% vs +16.33% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), KEMQ annualized +1.06% vs +14.15% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KEMQ or VOO?
KEMQ has been the more volatile fund at 24.3% annualized versus 16.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: KEMQ -70.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both KEMQ and VOO?
KEMQ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, KEMQ or VOO?
KEMQ yields 4.97% while VOO yields 1.04%, so KEMQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than KEMQ?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. KEMQ led over 3Y, VOO over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. KEMQ is less concentrated, with 34.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.