KLMN vs VXUS
Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, KLMN or VXUS?
VXUS has been ahead.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KLMN | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $2.4B | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 277 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +11.83% | +12.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.52% | +19.71%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.25% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.59% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9% | 11.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.2% | -13.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $12,820 | $14,639Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 11, 2024 to Sep 15, 2026 (1.8 years).
KLMN vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
KLMN vs VXUS Performance
Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KLMN returned +16.52% while VXUS returned +19.71%. Year to date, KLMN is up 11.83% versus a gain of 12.57% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KLMN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 11.6% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.2% for KLMN and -13.6% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KLMN charges 0.09% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $5 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KLMN currently yields 1.17% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 4.5% of KLMN's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 88.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
KLMN and VXUS share little of their money.
22 positions in common, counted across the 272 positions we hold weights for in KLMN and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 277 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KLMN | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| RY:CARoyal Bank Of Canada | 0.49% | 0.66% | 0.17% |
| RD:CAThe Toronto-Dominion Bank | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.10% |
| SHOP:CAShopify Inc | 0.30% | 0.32% | 0.02% |
| BMO:CABank Of Montreal | 0.24% | 0.28% | 0.04% |
| ENB:CAEnbridge Inc. | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.05% |
| BNS:CABank Of Nova Scotia/The Common Stock | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.00% |
| CM:CACanadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.03% |
| AEM:CAAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd | 0.27% | 0.17% | 0.10% |
| WPM:CAWheaton Precious Metals Corp | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.21% |
| BN:CABrookfield Corp | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.02% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KLMN and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KLMN or VXUS?
KLMN has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KLMN or VXUS?
Over the past year KLMN returned +16.52% vs +19.71% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), KLMN annualized +14.80% vs +23.58% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KLMN or VXUS?
KLMN has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 11.6% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: KLMN -19.2% vs VXUS -13.6%.
Should I hold both KLMN and VXUS?
KLMN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KLMN and VXUS?
At least 4.5% of KLMN's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 272 positions we hold weights for in KLMN and 8,082 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, KLMN or VXUS?
KLMN yields 1.17% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than KLMN?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.