KLMN vs VTI
Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, KLMN or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. KLMN led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KLMN | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.4B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 277 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +12.90%Best | +12.57% |
| 1Y Return | +18.00%Best | +17.22% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.87% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.2%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $12,781Best | $12,650 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 11, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.7 years).
KLMN vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
KLMN vs VTI Performance
Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KLMN returned +18.00% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, KLMN is up 12.90% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KLMN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.8% compared with 12.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.2% for KLMN and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KLMN charges 0.09% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KLMN currently yields 1.17% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 94.2% of KLMN's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of KLMN is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
240 positions in common, counted across the 269 positions we hold weights for in KLMN and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 277 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KLMN | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 6.98% | 6.32% | 0.66% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.49% | 5.84% | 0.65% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 4.99% | 3.81% | 1.18% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.83% | 3.17% | 0.66% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 3.48% | 2.88% | 0.60% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.69% | 2.46% | 0.23% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.14% | 2.27% | 0.13% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.46% | 1.79% | 0.33% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.32% | 1.63% | 0.31% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.29% | 1.40% | 0.11% |
94.2% of KLMN is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KLMN or VTI?
KLMN has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KLMN or VTI?
Over the past year KLMN returned +18.00% vs +17.22% for VTI, so KLMN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), KLMN annualized +15.53% vs +14.83% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KLMN or VTI?
KLMN has been the more volatile fund at 12.8% annualized versus 12.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KLMN -19.2% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both KLMN and VTI?
KLMN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KLMN and VTI?
At least 94.2% of KLMN's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 240 positions in common, counted across the 269 positions we hold weights for in KLMN and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, KLMN or VTI?
KLMN yields 1.17% while VTI yields 1.03%, so KLMN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than KLMN?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. KLMN led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.