KLMN vs SPY
Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
KLMN has a lower expense ratio. KLMN delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 503 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KLMN | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $2.3B | $789.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.20% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 281 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +14.09% | +13.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.99% | +21.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.44% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2024 | Jan 22, 1993 |
KLMN vs SPY Performance
Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year KLMN returned +21.99% while SPY returned +21.53%. Year to date, KLMN is up 14.09% versus a gain of 13.68% for SPY.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.1% for KLMN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.2% for KLMN and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KLMN charges 0.09% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $9 annually, a gap of $0 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KLMN currently yields 1.20% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
KLMN and SPY share 234 holdings out of 539 unique holdings combined, representing a 82.2% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KLMN or SPY?
KLMN has an expense ratio of 0.09% while SPY charges 0.09%. KLMN is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KLMN or SPY?
Over the past year KLMN returned +21.99% vs +21.53% for SPY, so KLMN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), KLMN annualized +17.09% vs +8.85% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KLMN or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.1% for KLMN. Worst drawdown: KLMN -19.2% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both KLMN and SPY?
KLMN and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between KLMN and SPY?
KLMN and SPY share 234 common holdings with a 82.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 539 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KLMN or SPY?
KLMN yields 1.20% while SPY yields 1.01%, so KLMN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.