KOID vs QQQ
KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, KOID or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. KOID led over the full window, QQQ over 1Y. KOID is less concentrated, with 23.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KOID | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $342M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.74% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 60 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +10.91% | +21.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.93% | +23.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +27.86% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.25% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.3% | 19.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.3% | -12.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $14,246Best | $14,153 |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.3%Best | 47.2% |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 1, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 5, 2025 to Oct 1, 2026 (1.3 years).
KOID vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
KOID vs QQQ Performance
KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF (KOID) is an ETF from KraneShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year KOID returned +12.93% while QQQ returned +23.58%. Year to date, KOID is up 10.91% versus a gain of 21.44% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KOID has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.3% compared with 19.1% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.3% for KOID and -12.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KOID charges 0.69% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $18 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KOID currently yields 0.74% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
13.9% of KOID's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 14.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings KOID also owns.
QQQ and KOID share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in KOID and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 60 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 89 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for KOID (83.7% of the fund), and 14 for KOID that do not appear in QQQ (28.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KOID | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.23% | 8.45% | 6.22% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.09% | 2.92% | 0.83% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 1.90% | 1.08% | 0.82% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 2.06% | 0.82% | 1.24% |
| TERTeradyne Inc - Common | 2.00% | 0.26% | 1.74% |
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 1.90% | 0.27% | 1.63% |
| NXPINxp Semiconductors Nv Sedol B505Pn7 | 1.74% | 0.26% | 1.48% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KOID and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KOID or QQQ?
KOID has an expense ratio of 0.69% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $51 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KOID or QQQ?
Over the past year KOID returned +12.93% vs +23.58% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), KOID annualized +31.29% vs +30.63% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KOID or QQQ?
KOID has been the more volatile fund at 30.3% annualized versus 19.1% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: KOID -20.3% vs QQQ -12.0%.
Should I hold both KOID and QQQ?
KOID and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KOID and QQQ?
14.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings KOID also owns. 14.1% of QQQ's is in holdings KOID also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in KOID and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, KOID or QQQ?
KOID yields 0.74% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so KOID currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than KOID?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. KOID led over the full window, QQQ over 1Y. KOID is less concentrated, with 23.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.