KTEC vs VTI
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KTEC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $58M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.88% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -19.73% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | -17.33% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.71% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -6.63% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 36.6% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -66.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 8, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
KTEC vs VTI Performance
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KTEC returned -17.33% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, KTEC is down 19.73% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, KTEC compounded at +2.71% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -6.63% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KTEC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.6% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.9% for KTEC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.19. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KTEC charges 0.69% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $3 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KTEC currently yields 3.88% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KTEC and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KTEC or VTI?
KTEC has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KTEC or VTI?
Over the past year KTEC returned -17.33% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), KTEC annualized -10.74% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KTEC or VTI?
KTEC has been the more volatile fund at 36.6% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KTEC -66.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KTEC and VTI?
KTEC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.19, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KTEC and VTI?
KTEC and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KTEC or VTI?
KTEC yields 3.88% while VTI yields 1.07%, so KTEC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.