KTEC vs VOO
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KTEC | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $58M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.88% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -19.73% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | -17.33% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.71% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -6.63% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 36.6% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -66.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 8, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
KTEC vs VOO Performance
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KTEC returned -17.33% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, KTEC is down 19.73% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, KTEC compounded at +2.71% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -6.63% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs -10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KTEC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.6% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.9% for KTEC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.20. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KTEC charges 0.69% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $3 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KTEC currently yields 3.88% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
KTEC and VOO share 0 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KTEC or VOO?
KTEC has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KTEC or VOO?
Over the past year KTEC returned -17.33% vs +21.79% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), KTEC annualized -10.74% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KTEC or VOO?
KTEC has been the more volatile fund at 36.6% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: KTEC -66.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both KTEC and VOO?
KTEC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.20, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KTEC and VOO?
KTEC and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KTEC or VOO?
KTEC yields 3.88% while VOO yields 1.08%, so KTEC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.