KTEC vs VYM
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KTEC | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $58M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.88% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | -19.73% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | -17.33% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.71% | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -6.63% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 36.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -66.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 8, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
KTEC vs VYM Performance
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KTEC returned -17.33% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, KTEC is down 19.73% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Over three years, KTEC compounded at +2.71% per year against +19.03% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -6.63% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.10% annualized vs -10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KTEC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.9% for KTEC and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KTEC charges 0.69% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $4 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KTEC currently yields 3.88% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
KTEC and VYM share 0 holdings out of 607 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KTEC or VYM?
KTEC has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KTEC or VYM?
Over the past year KTEC returned -17.33% vs +24.22% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), KTEC annualized -10.74% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KTEC or VYM?
KTEC has been the more volatile fund at 36.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: KTEC -66.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both KTEC and VYM?
KTEC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KTEC and VYM?
KTEC and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 607 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KTEC or VYM?
KTEC yields 3.88% while VYM yields 2.24%, so KTEC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.