LGHT vs VOO
Langar Global Healthtech ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LGHT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 29 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +2.86% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.77% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Langar Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 10, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
LGHT vs VOO Performance
Langar Global Healthtech ETF (LGHT) is a ETF from Langar Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LGHT returned -0.77% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, LGHT is up 2.86% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LGHT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.6% for LGHT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LGHT charges 0.85% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LGHT currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
LGHT and VOO share 10 holdings out of 523 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LGHT or VOO?
LGHT has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LGHT or VOO?
Over the past year LGHT returned -0.77% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), LGHT annualized +0.35% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LGHT or VOO?
LGHT has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LGHT -28.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both LGHT and VOO?
LGHT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LGHT and VOO?
LGHT and VOO share 10 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 523 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LGHT or VOO?
LGHT yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.