LMTL vs VYM
Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. LMTL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 613 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LMTL | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $6M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.47% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 613 | |
| YTD Return | +4.68% | +15.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.92% | +22.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 85.6% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -49.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 6, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
LMTL vs VYM Performance
Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF (LMTL) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LMTL returned +23.92% while VYM returned +22.23%. Year to date, LMTL is up 4.68% versus a gain of 15.29% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LMTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 85.6% compared with 14.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.3% for LMTL and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.24. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LMTL charges 1.07% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $4 annually, a gap of $103 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LMTL currently yields 3.47% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
LMTL and VYM share 1 holdings out of 606 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LMTL | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMT | 13.47% | 0.43% | 13.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LMTL or VYM?
LMTL has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $103 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LMTL or VYM?
Over the past year LMTL returned +23.92% vs +22.23% for VYM, so LMTL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LMTL annualized +29.98% vs +7.02% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LMTL or VYM?
LMTL has been the more volatile fund at 85.6% annualized versus 14.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: LMTL -49.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both LMTL and VYM?
LMTL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.24, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LMTL and VYM?
LMTL and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 606 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LMTL or VYM?
LMTL yields 3.47% while VYM yields 2.24%, so LMTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.