LMTL vs VTI
Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LMTL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LMTL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.47% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +19.72% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +44.69% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 87.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -49.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 6, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
LMTL vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF (LMTL) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LMTL returned +44.69% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, LMTL is up 19.72% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LMTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 87.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.3% for LMTL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.15. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LMTL charges 1.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LMTL currently yields 3.47% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
LMTL and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2790 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LMTL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMT | 16.29% | 0.16% | 16.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LMTL or VTI?
LMTL has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $104 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LMTL or VTI?
Over the past year LMTL returned +44.69% vs +21.39% for VTI, so LMTL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LMTL annualized +49.38% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LMTL or VTI?
LMTL has been the more volatile fund at 87.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: LMTL -49.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both LMTL and VTI?
LMTL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.15, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LMTL and VTI?
LMTL and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2790 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LMTL or VTI?
LMTL yields 3.47% while VTI yields 1.07%, so LMTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.