LMTL vs VXUS
LMTL vs VXUS
Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. LMTL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LMTL | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $10M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.43% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +27.23% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +64.04% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 87.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -49.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 6, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
LMTL vs VXUS Performance
Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF (LMTL) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LMTL returned +64.04% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, LMTL is up 27.23% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LMTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 87.2% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.3% for LMTL and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.24. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LMTL charges 1.07% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $5 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LMTL currently yields 4.43% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
LMTL and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7865 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LMTL or VXUS?
LMTL has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $102 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LMTL or VXUS?
Over the past year LMTL returned +64.04% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so LMTL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LMTL annualized +61.00% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LMTL or VXUS?
LMTL has been the more volatile fund at 87.2% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: LMTL -49.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both LMTL and VXUS?
LMTL and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.24, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LMTL and VXUS?
LMTL and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7865 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LMTL or VXUS?
LMTL yields 4.43% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so LMTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.