LNGX vs QQQ
Global X US Natural Gas ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, LNGX or QQQ?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. LNGX led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.57, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LNGX | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $51M | $437.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 74 | 208 |
| YTD Return | +22.40%Best | +12.98% |
| 1Y Return | +20.91%Best | +11.59% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.74% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.4% | 22.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -17.9% | -14.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $12,999Best | $10,878 |
| Top 10 Weight | 53.4% | 46.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 28, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 29, 2025 to Nov 11, 2026 (1 years).
LNGX vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
LNGX vs QQQ Performance
Global X US Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year LNGX returned +20.91% while QQQ returned +11.59%. Year to date, LNGX is up 22.40% versus a gain of 12.98% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LNGX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.4% compared with 22.3% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.9% for LNGX and -14.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.57. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LNGX charges 0.45% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $18 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LNGX currently yields 0.73% against 0.43% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
3.9% of LNGX's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings LNGX also owns.
They hold the same names on opposite sides, so owning both offsets the exposure rather than doubling it.
1 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in LNGX and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 74 and 208.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 93 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for LNGX (97.0% of the fund), and 33 for LNGX that do not appear in QQQ (91.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LNGX | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FANGDiamondback Energy Inc. | 3.91% | 0.23% | 3.68% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LNGX and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LNGX or QQQ?
LNGX has an expense ratio of 0.45% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LNGX or QQQ?
Over the past year LNGX returned +20.91% vs +11.59% for QQQ, so LNGX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LNGX annualized +29.99% vs +8.78% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LNGX or QQQ?
LNGX has been the more volatile fund at 32.4% annualized versus 22.3% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: LNGX -17.9% vs QQQ -14.8%.
Should I hold both LNGX and QQQ?
LNGX and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.57, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LNGX and QQQ?
3.9% of LNGX's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.2% of QQQ's is in holdings LNGX also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in LNGX and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, LNGX or QQQ?
LNGX yields 0.73% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so LNGX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than LNGX?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. LNGX led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.57, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.