LNGX vs VOO
Global X US Natural Gas ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, LNGX or VOO?
VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LNGX | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $53M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.77% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 37 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +27.89%Best | +11.55% |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.1% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 28, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
LNGX vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
LNGX vs VOO Performance
Global X US Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, LNGX is up 27.89% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LNGX charges 0.45% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LNGX currently yields 0.77% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
43.3% of LNGX's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.7% of VOO's money is in holdings LNGX also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in LNGX and 505 in VOO, against full books of 37 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 487 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for LNGX (98.8% of the fund), and 25 for LNGX that do not appear in VOO (52.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LNGX | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHKChesapeake Energy Corp | 7.97% | 0.03% | 7.94% |
| EQTEqt Corp | 7.62% | 0.05% | 7.57% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 4.26% | 0.11% | 4.15% |
| FANGDiamondback Energy Inc. | 4.01% | 0.05% | 3.96% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 3.90% | 0.10% | 3.80% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 3.91% | 0.08% | 3.83% |
| OXYOccidental Petroleum Corp. | 3.93% | 0.05% | 3.88% |
| DVNDevon Energy Corp. | 3.91% | 0.07% | 3.84% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 3.82% | 0.14% | 3.68% |
43.3% of LNGX is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LNGX or VOO?
LNGX has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between LNGX and VOO?
43.3% of LNGX's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.7% of VOO's is in holdings LNGX also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in LNGX and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, LNGX or VOO?
LNGX yields 0.77% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than LNGX?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.