LNGX vs VOO
Global X US Natural Gas ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, LNGX or VOO?
LNGX has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. LNGX led over 1Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LNGX | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $51M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 1.05% |
| Holdings | 74 | 519 |
| YTD Return | +19.83%Best | +10.69% |
| 1Y Return | +20.38%Best | +11.33% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.65% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.1% | 12.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -17.9% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $12,743Best | $11,002 |
| Top 10 Weight | 53.4% | 39.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 28, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 29, 2025 to Nov 10, 2026 (1 years).
LNGX vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
LNGX vs VOO Performance
Global X US Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LNGX returned +20.38% while VOO returned +11.33%. Year to date, LNGX is up 19.83% versus a gain of 10.69% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LNGX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.1% compared with 12.9% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.9% for LNGX and -8.9% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.30. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LNGX charges 0.45% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LNGX currently yields 0.73% against 1.05% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
42.6% of LNGX's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.7% of VOO's money is in holdings LNGX also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in LNGX and 506 in VOO, against full books of 74 and 519.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 492 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for LNGX (99.3% of the fund), and 25 for LNGX that do not appear in VOO (52.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LNGX | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHKChesapeake Energy Corp | 7.44% | 0.03% | 7.41% |
| EQTEqt Corp | 7.27% | 0.05% | 7.22% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 4.31% | 0.11% | 4.20% |
| DVNDevon Energy Corp. | 4.19% | 0.08% | 4.11% |
| OXYOccidental Petroleum Corp. | 4.14% | 0.06% | 4.08% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 3.90% | 0.09% | 3.81% |
| FANGDiamondback Energy Inc. | 3.91% | 0.06% | 3.85% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 3.87% | 0.08% | 3.79% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 3.54% | 0.13% | 3.41% |
42.6% of LNGX is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LNGX or VOO?
LNGX has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LNGX or VOO?
Over the past year LNGX returned +20.38% vs +11.33% for VOO, so LNGX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LNGX annualized +27.43% vs +10.02% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LNGX or VOO?
LNGX has been the more volatile fund at 33.1% annualized versus 12.9% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LNGX -17.9% vs VOO -8.9%.
Should I hold both LNGX and VOO?
LNGX and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.30, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LNGX and VOO?
42.6% of LNGX's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.7% of VOO's is in holdings LNGX also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in LNGX and 506 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, LNGX or VOO?
LNGX yields 0.73% while VOO yields 1.05%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than LNGX?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. LNGX led over 1Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.