LOWV vs SCHD

LOWV vs SCHD

Which is better, LOWV or SCHD?

Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. LOWV led over 3Y and the full window, SCHD over 1Y. LOWV is less concentrated, with 41.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: LOWV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLOWVSCHD
Expense Ratio0.39%0.06%Best
AUM$200M$112.1B
Dividend Yield0.86%3.00%
Holdings72103
YTD Return+6.11%+21.99%Best
1Y Return+6.25%+25.92%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+15.90%Best+15.66%
5Y Return (annualized)-+9.48%
Volatility (annualized)9.8%Best13.6%
Max Drawdown-13.9%Best-16.1%
$10,000 over 3.5 years$17,210Best$15,984
Top 10 Weight41.7%Best41.8%
Fund FamilyAllianceBernstein L.P.Charles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionMar 22, 2023Oct 20, 2011

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 22, 2023 to Sep 23, 2026 (3.5 years).

LOWV vs SCHD growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.5 years both funds cover.

LOWV vs SCHD Performance

AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year LOWV returned +6.25% while SCHD returned +25.92%. Year to date, LOWV is up 6.11% versus a gain of 21.99% for SCHD.

Over three years, LOWV compounded at +15.90% per year against +15.66% for SCHD. Across the full 4-year window we track, LOWV has the edge at +16.78% annualized vs +14.34%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 9.8% for LOWV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.9% for LOWV and -16.1% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

LOWV charges 0.39% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $6 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LOWV currently yields 0.86% against 3.00% for SCHD.

Holdings Overlap

LOWV already in SCHD5.9%
SCHD already in LOWV19.4%

5.9% of LOWV's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 19.4% of SCHD's money is in holdings LOWV also owns.

SCHD and LOWV share little of their money.

5 positions in common, counted across the 68 positions we hold weights for in LOWV and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 72 and 103.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 94 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for LOWV (80.5% of the fund), and 56 for LOWV that do not appear in SCHD (87.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in LOWVWeight in SCHDDifference
MRKMerck & Company Inc2.34%4.77%2.43%
KOCoca Cola Co.0.66%4.17%3.51%
UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated0.93%3.82%2.89%
PGProcter & Gamble Company0.77%3.83%3.06%
ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc.1.22%2.79%1.57%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of LOWV and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

LOWVSCHD

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, LOWV or SCHD?

LOWV has an expense ratio of 0.39% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $33 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, LOWV or SCHD?

Over the past year LOWV returned +6.25% vs +25.92% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), LOWV annualized +16.78% vs +14.34% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, LOWV or SCHD?

SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 9.8% for LOWV. Worst drawdown: LOWV -13.9% vs SCHD -16.1%.

Should I hold both LOWV and SCHD?

LOWV and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between LOWV and SCHD?

19.4% of SCHD's money is in holdings LOWV also owns. 19.4% of SCHD's is in holdings LOWV also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 68 positions we hold weights for in LOWV and 100 in SCHD.

Which pays a higher dividend, LOWV or SCHD?

LOWV yields 0.86% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SCHD better than LOWV?

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. LOWV led over 3Y and the full window, SCHD over 1Y. LOWV is less concentrated, with 41.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.