LQIG vs VXUS
State Street SPDR MarketAxess Investment Grade 400 Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LQIG | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $28M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.07% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 371 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +0.13% | +14.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.27% | +27.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.73% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | May 11, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
LQIG vs VXUS Performance
State Street SPDR MarketAxess Investment Grade 400 Corporate Bond ETF (LQIG) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LQIG returned +6.27% while VXUS returned +27.24%. Year to date, LQIG is up 0.13% versus a gain of 14.07% for VXUS.
Over three years, LQIG compounded at +4.73% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.83% annualized vs +3.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.1% for LQIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.9% for LQIG and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LQIG charges 0.07% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $5 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LQIG currently yields 5.07% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
LQIG and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7943 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LQIG or VXUS?
LQIG has an expense ratio of 0.07% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LQIG or VXUS?
Over the past year LQIG returned +6.27% vs +27.24% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), LQIG annualized +3.61% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LQIG or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.1% for LQIG. Worst drawdown: LQIG -11.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both LQIG and VXUS?
LQIG and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LQIG and VXUS?
LQIG and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7943 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LQIG or VXUS?
LQIG yields 5.07% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so LQIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.