LRCU vs VTI
Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LRCU delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LRCU | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $49M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -33.32% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +110.75% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 170.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -80.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 18, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
LRCU vs VTI Performance
Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) is a ETF from Tradr ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LRCU returned +110.75% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, LRCU is down 33.32% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LRCU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 170.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.0% for LRCU and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LRCU charges 1.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $3 annually, a gap of $127 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LRCU currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
LRCU and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LRCU | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 200.00% | 0.74% | 199.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LRCU or VTI?
LRCU has an expense ratio of 1.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $127 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LRCU or VTI?
Over the past year LRCU returned +110.75% vs +22.35% for VTI, so LRCU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LRCU annualized +102.06% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LRCU or VTI?
LRCU has been the more volatile fund at 170.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: LRCU -80.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both LRCU and VTI?
LRCU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LRCU and VTI?
LRCU and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LRCU or VTI?
LRCU yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.