LRCU vs QQQ
Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. LRCU delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LRCU | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.30% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $49M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -33.32% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +110.75% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 170.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -80.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 18, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
LRCU vs QQQ Performance
Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) is a ETF from Tradr ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year LRCU returned +110.75% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, LRCU is down 33.32% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LRCU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 170.7% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.0% for LRCU and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LRCU charges 1.30% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $18 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LRCU currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
LRCU and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 102 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LRCU | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 200.00% | 1.69% | 198.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LRCU or QQQ?
LRCU has an expense ratio of 1.30% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $112 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LRCU or QQQ?
Over the past year LRCU returned +110.75% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so LRCU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LRCU annualized +102.06% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LRCU or QQQ?
LRCU has been the more volatile fund at 170.7% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: LRCU -80.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both LRCU and QQQ?
LRCU and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LRCU and QQQ?
LRCU and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 1.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 102 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LRCU or QQQ?
LRCU yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.