LRCU vs VOO
Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. LRCU delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LRCU | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $49M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -33.32% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +110.75% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 170.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -80.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 18, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
LRCU vs VOO Performance
Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) is a ETF from Tradr ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LRCU returned +110.75% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, LRCU is down 33.32% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LRCU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 170.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.0% for LRCU and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LRCU charges 1.30% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $3 annually, a gap of $127 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LRCU currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
LRCU and VOO share 1 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LRCU | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 200.00% | 0.84% | 199.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LRCU or VOO?
LRCU has an expense ratio of 1.30% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $127 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LRCU or VOO?
Over the past year LRCU returned +110.75% vs +21.87% for VOO, so LRCU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LRCU annualized +102.06% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LRCU or VOO?
LRCU has been the more volatile fund at 170.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LRCU -80.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both LRCU and VOO?
LRCU and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LRCU and VOO?
LRCU and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LRCU or VOO?
LRCU yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.