LULG vs VOO
Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, LULG or VOO?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LULG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $8M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 5 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -84.10% | +11.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 5, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
LULG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
LULG vs VOO Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG) is an ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, LULG is down 84.10% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LULG charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LULG currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in LULG and 505 in VOO, totalling 10.8% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 64 days apart, LULG as of Sep 2, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in LULG and 505 in VOO, against full books of 5 and 509.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LULG and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LULG or VOO?
LULG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, LULG or VOO?
LULG yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than LULG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.