LUNC vs VTI

LUNC vs VTI

Which is better, LUNC or VTI?

Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 69.5%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLUNCVTI
Expense Ratio0.75%0.03%Best
AUM$33M$689.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings273,524
YTD Return+1.28%+12.64%Best
1Y Return-+12.58%
3Y Return (annualized)-+24.33%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.30%
Top 10 Weight69.5%33.5%Best
Fund FamilyLongnook ETF LLCVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 28, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

LUNC vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

LUNC vs VTI Performance

Longnook Uncommon Compounders ETF (LUNC) is an ETF from Longnook ETF LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, LUNC is up 1.28% versus a gain of 12.64% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

LUNC charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LUNC currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

LUNC already in VTI57.0%
VTI already in LUNC1.5%

57.0% of LUNC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.5% of VTI's money is in holdings LUNC also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

16 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in LUNC and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 27 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,147 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for LUNC (96.2% of the fund), and 4 for LUNC that do not appear in VTI (6.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in LUNCWeight in VTIDifference
NEMNewmont Corp Common13.19%0.18%13.01%
XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd9.20%0.90%8.30%
JAZZJazz Pharmaceuticals Plc.5.09%0.02%5.07%
ALKS:IEAlkermes Plc. Ordinary Shares4.77%0.01%4.76%
ZTSZoetis  Inc .4.36%0.04%4.32%
STZConstellation Brands Inc Common Stock Usd 0.013.48%0.03%3.45%
EQTEQT Corp.2.79%0.05%2.74%
PRGProg Holdings Inc2.49%0.00%2.49%
FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc.2.22%0.15%2.07%
LMBLimbach Holdings Inc2.35%0.00%2.35%

57.0% of LUNC is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

LUNCVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, LUNC or VTI?

LUNC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between LUNC and VTI?

57.0% of LUNC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.5% of VTI's is in holdings LUNC also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in LUNC and 3,441 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, LUNC or VTI?

LUNC yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than LUNC?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 69.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.