MAKX vs VTI
Proshares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MAKX delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MAKX | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $5M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.14% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 25 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +31.01% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.35% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.78% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.44% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
MAKX vs VTI Performance
Proshares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MAKX returned +36.35% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, MAKX is up 31.01% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, MAKX compounded at +24.78% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.44% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, MAKX has the edge at +11.44% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAKX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.3% for MAKX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MAKX charges 0.58% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MAKX currently yields 0.14% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MAKX and VTI share 17 holdings out of 2794 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MAKX or VTI?
MAKX has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MAKX or VTI?
Over the past year MAKX returned +36.35% vs +22.35% for VTI, so MAKX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), MAKX annualized +11.44% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MAKX or VTI?
MAKX has been the more volatile fund at 29.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MAKX -40.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MAKX and VTI?
MAKX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MAKX and VTI?
MAKX and VTI share 17 common holdings with a 4.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2794 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MAKX or VTI?
MAKX yields 0.14% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.