MCN vs VXUS

MCN vs VXUS

Which is better, MCN or VXUS?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Higher Returns: VXUS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMCNVXUS
Expense Ratio-0.05%
AUM$133M$158.1B
Dividend Yield11.41%2.51%
Holdings818,747
YTD Return-1.46%+12.82%Best
1Y Return-0.74%+19.86%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+2.49%+19.33%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+3.20%+9.46%Best
Volatility (annualized)15.3%15.0%Best
Max Drawdown-56.4%-39.9%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$11,706$15,714Best
Fund FamilyMadison FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 28, 2004Jan 26, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 28, 2011 to Sep 18, 2026 (15.6 years).

MCN vs VXUS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.6 years both funds cover.

MCN vs VXUS Performance

XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund (MCN) is an ETF from Madison Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MCN returned -0.74% while VXUS returned +19.86%. Year to date, MCN is down 1.46% versus a gain of 12.82% for VXUS.

Over three years, MCN compounded at +2.49% per year against +19.33% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +3.20% and +9.46% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.72% annualized vs +0.66%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

MCN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.0% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.4% for MCN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 41 holdings in MCN and 8,082 in VXUS, totalling 102.9% and 88.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in MCN and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 81 and 8,747.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of MCN and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

MCNVXUS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which performed better, MCN or VXUS?

Over the past year MCN returned -0.74% vs +19.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), MCN annualized +0.66% vs +4.72% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, MCN or VXUS?

MCN has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.0% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: MCN -56.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.

Should I hold both MCN and VXUS?

MCN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, MCN or VXUS?

MCN yields 11.41% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so MCN currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VXUS better than MCN?

VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.