MCN vs VXUS
MCN vs VXUS
XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MCN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $130M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.96% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 81 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -0.19% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.91% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.03% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.19% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -75.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Madison Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 28, 2004 | Jan 26, 2011 |
MCN vs VXUS Performance
XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund (MCN) is a ETF from Madison Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MCN returned +2.91% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, MCN is down 0.19% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, MCN compounded at +2.03% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +3.19% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs -1.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MCN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.2% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -75.1% for MCN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Holdings Overlap
MCN and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7901 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, MCN or VXUS?
Over the past year MCN returned +2.91% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), MCN annualized -1.84% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MCN or VXUS?
MCN has been the more volatile fund at 17.2% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: MCN -75.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both MCN and VXUS?
MCN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MCN and VXUS?
MCN and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7901 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MCN or VXUS?
MCN yields 11.96% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so MCN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.