MCN vs VTI
XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MCN | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $130M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.96% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 81 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +0.34% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.22% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.48% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.58% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.2% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -75.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Madison Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 28, 2004 | May 24, 2001 |
MCN vs VTI Performance
XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund (MCN) is a ETF from Madison Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MCN returned +2.22% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, MCN is up 0.34% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, MCN compounded at +2.48% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.58% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -1.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MCN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.2% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -75.1% for MCN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Holdings Overlap
MCN and VTI share 34 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, MCN or VTI?
Over the past year MCN returned +2.22% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), MCN annualized -1.81% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MCN or VTI?
MCN has been the more volatile fund at 17.2% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MCN -75.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MCN and VTI?
MCN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MCN and VTI?
MCN and VTI share 34 common holdings with a 13.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MCN or VTI?
MCN yields 11.96% while VTI yields 1.07%, so MCN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.