MCN vs VTI
XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MCN or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MCN | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.03% |
| AUM | $133M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 11.41% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 81 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -4.72% | +12.43%Best |
| 1Y Return | -2.29% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +1.42% | +22.42%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.51% | +12.37%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.2% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -75.1% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,320 | $17,916Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Madison Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 28, 2004 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 26, 2004 to Sep 28, 2026 (22.1 years).
MCN vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MCN vs VTI Performance
XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund (MCN) is an ETF from Madison Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MCN returned -2.29% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, MCN is down 4.72% versus a gain of 12.43% for VTI.
Over three years, MCN compounded at +1.42% per year against +22.42% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.51% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.64% annualized vs -2.03%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MCN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.2% compared with 15.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -75.1% for MCN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Holdings Overlap
93.9% of MCN's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 17.2% of VTI's money is in holdings MCN also owns.
Most of MCN is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
39 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in MCN and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 81 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,112 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for MCN (80.3% of the fund), and 1 for MCN that do not appear in VTI (7.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MCN | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.52% | 4.79% | 2.27% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.06% | 3.65% | 1.59% |
| RIG:SMTransocean Ltd. | 4.38% | 0.01% | 4.37% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.63% | 2.56% | 0.93% |
| CVSCvs Corp | 3.95% | 0.18% | 3.77% |
| MTDRMatador Resources Co | 4.03% | 0.01% | 4.02% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 3.61% | 0.26% | 3.35% |
| DHRDanaher Corporation | 3.62% | 0.17% | 3.45% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.04% | 1.70% | 0.34% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.86% | 0.83% | 2.03% |
93.9% of MCN is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, MCN or VTI?
Over the past year MCN returned -2.29% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), MCN annualized -2.03% vs +9.64% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MCN or VTI?
MCN has been the more volatile fund at 17.2% annualized versus 15.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MCN -75.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MCN and VTI?
MCN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MCN and VTI?
93.9% of MCN's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 17.2% of VTI's is in holdings MCN also owns. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in MCN and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, MCN or VTI?
MCN yields 11.41% while VTI yields 1.03%, so MCN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MCN?
VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.