MCN vs VTI
XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MCN or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MCN | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.03% |
| AUM | $133M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 11.59% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 81 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +2.12% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.47% | +20.00%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.42% | +20.95%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.27% | +11.81%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -75.1% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,745 | $17,474Best |
| Fund Family | Madison Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 28, 2004 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 26, 2004 to Sep 4, 2026 (22 years).
MCN vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MCN vs VTI Performance
XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund (MCN) is an ETF from Madison Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MCN returned +2.47% while VTI returned +20.00%. Year to date, MCN is up 2.12% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.
Over three years, MCN compounded at +3.42% per year against +20.95% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.27% and +11.81% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.72% annualized vs -1.73%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MCN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -75.1% for MCN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Holdings Overlap
At least 81.3% of MCN's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of MCN is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 91 days apart, MCN as of Mar 31, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
35 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in MCN and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 81 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MCN | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.02% | 3.17% | 0.15% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 2.36% | 3.81% | 1.45% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.07% | 2.46% | 0.39% |
| APAApa Corp | 4.21% | 0.02% | 4.19% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 3.91% | 0.25% | 3.66% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 1.95% | 1.70% | 0.25% |
| DHRDanaher Corporation | 3.41% | 0.17% | 3.24% |
| LVSLas Vegas Sands Corp. | 3.52% | 0.02% | 3.50% |
| MDTMedtronic Plc Ordinary Shares | 3.02% | 0.14% | 2.88% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.38% | 0.77% | 1.61% |
81.3% of MCN is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, MCN or VTI?
Over the past year MCN returned +2.47% vs +20.00% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), MCN annualized -1.73% vs +9.72% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MCN or VTI?
MCN has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MCN -75.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MCN and VTI?
MCN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MCN and VTI?
At least 81.3% of MCN's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 35 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in MCN and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, MCN or VTI?
MCN yields 11.59% while VTI yields 1.07%, so MCN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MCN?
VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.