IVV vs MCN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund
Quick Verdict
IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MCN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | - | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $130M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 11.96% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 81 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +0.69% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +3.91% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +2.61% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | +3.29% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 17.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -75.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Madison Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 28, 2004 |
IVV vs MCN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund (MCN) is a ETF from Madison Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while MCN returned +3.91%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 0.69% for MCN.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +2.61% for MCN; over five years the annualized figures are +13.26% and +3.29% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs -1.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MCN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -75.1% for MCN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MCN share 35 holdings out of 510 unique holdings combined, representing a 14.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, IVV or MCN?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +3.91% for MCN, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs -1.80% for MCN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MCN?
MCN has been the more volatile fund at 17.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MCN -75.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and MCN?
IVV and MCN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MCN?
IVV and MCN share 35 common holdings with a 14.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 510 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MCN?
IVV yields 1.09% while MCN yields 11.96%, so MCN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.