MCN vs VYM
XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, MCN or VYM?
VYM has been ahead.
VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MCN | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.04% |
| AUM | $133M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 11.41% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 81 | 613 |
| YTD Return | -5.26% | +9.40%Best |
| 1Y Return | -2.84% | +13.45%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +1.86% | +18.32%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.08% | +11.37%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.0% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -74.7% | -58.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,084 | $17,133Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.5% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Madison Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 28, 2004 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2006 to Sep 29, 2026 (19.9 years).
MCN vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.9 years both funds cover.
MCN vs VYM Performance
XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund (MCN) is an ETF from Madison Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MCN returned -2.84% while VYM returned +13.45%. Year to date, MCN is down 5.26% versus a gain of 9.40% for VYM.
Over three years, MCN compounded at +1.86% per year against +18.32% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +2.08% and +11.37% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.71% annualized vs -2.02%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MCN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -74.7% for MCN and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Holdings Overlap
58.8% of MCN's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 16.2% of VYM's money is in holdings MCN also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
25 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in MCN and 557 in VYM, against full books of 81 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 504 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for MCN (81.3% of the fund), and 15 for MCN that do not appear in VYM (39.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MCN | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.63% | 7.35% | 5.72% |
| CVSCvs Corp | 3.95% | 0.54% | 3.41% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 3.61% | 0.77% | 2.84% |
| MTDRMatador Resources Co | 4.03% | 0.02% | 4.01% |
| CMECme Group, Cl A | 3.20% | 0.39% | 2.81% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 3.33% | 0.15% | 3.18% |
| APAApa Corp | 3.42% | 0.05% | 3.37% |
| MDTMedtronic Plc Ordinary Shares | 2.89% | 0.44% | 2.45% |
| LVSLas Vegas Sands Corp. | 3.20% | 0.05% | 3.15% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 1.73% | 1.37% | 0.36% |
58.8% of MCN is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, MCN or VYM?
Over the past year MCN returned -2.84% vs +13.45% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), MCN annualized -2.02% vs +6.71% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MCN or VYM?
MCN has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: MCN -74.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both MCN and VYM?
MCN and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MCN and VYM?
58.8% of MCN's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 16.2% of VYM's is in holdings MCN also owns. They hold 25 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in MCN and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, MCN or VYM?
MCN yields 11.41% while VYM yields 2.22%, so MCN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than MCN?
VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.