MFMO vs QQQ
Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, MFMO or QQQ?
QQQ costs less.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFMO | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $13M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 76 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +12.89% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +21.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.24% |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.9% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Motley Fool Asset Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 8, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
MFMO vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MFMO vs QQQ Performance
Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF (MFMO) is an ETF from Motley Fool Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, MFMO is up 12.89% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MFMO charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MFMO currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
49.4% of MFMO's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 27.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings MFMO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
16 positions in common, counted across the 72 positions we hold weights for in MFMO and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 76 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 72 and 102 positions we hold weights for.
QQQ holds 80 positions MFMO does not, 70.2% of the fund.
Largest: AAPL 7.27%, MSFT 5.76%, AMZN 4.67%, MU 4.43%, GOOGL 3.36%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MFMO | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.09% | 8.44% | 2.35% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 5.30% | 3.13% | 2.17% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.25% | 3.16% | 2.09% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.65% | 3.45% | 1.20% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 3.67% | 2.23% | 1.44% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 4.09% | 1.69% | 2.40% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 3.29% | 1.30% | 1.99% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 2.96% | 0.94% | 2.02% |
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 3.04% | 0.29% | 2.75% |
| ALABAstera Labs Inc - Common | 2.21% | 0.24% | 1.97% |
49.4% of MFMO is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MFMO or QQQ?
MFMO has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between MFMO and QQQ?
49.4% of MFMO's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 27.4% of QQQ's is in holdings MFMO also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 72 positions we hold weights for in MFMO and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, MFMO or QQQ?
MFMO yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than MFMO?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.