MIN vs VOO
Aberdeen Intermediate Income Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, MIN or VOO?
VOO has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MIN | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.64% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $297M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 9.05% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 219 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -5.23% | +12.50%Best |
| 1Y Return | -5.82% | +17.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.70% | +21.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.26% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.0%Best | 14.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -55.0% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,871 | $18,384Best |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 17, 1988 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 11, 2026 (16 years).
MIN vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MIN vs VOO Performance
Aberdeen Intermediate Income Fund (MIN) is an ETF from Aberdeen Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MIN returned -5.82% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, MIN is down 5.23% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.
Over three years, MIN compounded at +3.70% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -0.26% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.41% annualized vs -3.69%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 8.0% for MIN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.0% for MIN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MIN charges 0.64% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $64 vs $3 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MIN currently yields 9.05% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.1% of VOO's money is in holdings MIN also owns.
Stated as a floor: for MIN, our book for it covers 72.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
The two holdings books were reported 150 days apart, MIN as of Jan 31, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 149 positions we hold weights for in MIN and 505 in VOO, against full books of 219 and 509.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MIN | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TMUST-Mobile Usa, Inc. 3.875% 15-Apr-2030 | 0.80% | 0.12% | 0.68% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MIN and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MIN or VOO?
MIN has an expense ratio of 0.64% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MIN or VOO?
Over the past year MIN returned -5.82% vs +17.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), MIN annualized -3.69% vs +13.41% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MIN or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 8.0% for MIN. Worst drawdown: MIN -55.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MIN and VOO?
MIN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MIN or VOO?
MIN yields 9.05% while VOO yields 1.04%, so MIN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than MIN?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.