MINV vs VTI
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MINV or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MINV led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MINV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $165M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 67 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +33.40%Best | +12.43% |
| 1Y Return | +33.90%Best | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +30.85%Best | +22.42% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.2% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.5% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.2 years | $19,919 | $21,021Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.9% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Matthews Asia Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 13, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2022 to Sep 28, 2026 (4.2 years).
MINV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.2 years both funds cover.
MINV vs VTI Performance
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) is an ETF from Matthews Asia Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MINV returned +33.90% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, MINV is up 33.40% versus a gain of 12.43% for VTI.
Over three years, MINV compounded at +30.85% per year against +22.42% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +19.35% annualized vs +17.83%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MINV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.2% compared with 14.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.5% for MINV and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MINV charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MINV currently yields 1.08% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
0.8% of MINV's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 55 positions we hold weights for in MINV and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 67 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,149 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for MINV (97.4% of the fund), and 4 for MINV that do not appear in VTI (12.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MINV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAOIApplied Optoelectronics Inc | 0.79% | 0.01% | 0.78% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MINV and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MINV or VTI?
MINV has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MINV or VTI?
Over the past year MINV returned +33.90% vs +15.92% for VTI, so MINV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), MINV annualized +17.83% vs +19.35% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MINV or VTI?
MINV has been the more volatile fund at 27.2% annualized versus 14.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MINV -23.5% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both MINV and VTI?
MINV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MINV or VTI?
MINV yields 1.08% while VTI yields 1.03%, so MINV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MINV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MINV led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.