MINV vs VTI
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MINV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MINV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $161M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.97% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 62 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +37.79% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +52.34% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +30.16% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Matthews Asia Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 13, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
MINV vs VTI Performance
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) is a ETF from Matthews Asia Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MINV returned +52.34% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, MINV is up 37.79% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, MINV compounded at +30.16% per year against +21.27% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, MINV has the edge at +19.38% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MINV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.5% for MINV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MINV charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MINV currently yields 0.97% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MINV and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2849 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MINV or VTI?
MINV has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MINV or VTI?
Over the past year MINV returned +52.34% vs +22.19% for VTI, so MINV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), MINV annualized +19.38% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MINV or VTI?
MINV has been the more volatile fund at 27.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MINV -23.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MINV and VTI?
MINV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MINV and VTI?
MINV and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2849 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MINV or VTI?
MINV yields 0.97% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.