MINV vs VXUS
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. MINV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MINV | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $161M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.97% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 62 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +35.86% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +53.33% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +29.58% | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Matthews Asia Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 13, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
MINV vs VXUS Performance
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) is a ETF from Matthews Asia Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MINV returned +53.33% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, MINV is up 35.86% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Over three years, MINV compounded at +29.58% per year against +19.53% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, MINV has the edge at +18.99% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MINV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.5% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.5% for MINV and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MINV charges 0.79% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $5 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MINV currently yields 0.97% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
MINV and VXUS share 47 holdings out of 7880 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MINV or VXUS?
MINV has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $74 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MINV or VXUS?
Over the past year MINV returned +53.33% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so MINV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), MINV annualized +18.99% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MINV or VXUS?
MINV has been the more volatile fund at 27.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: MINV -23.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both MINV and VXUS?
MINV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MINV and VXUS?
MINV and VXUS share 47 common holdings with a 6.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7880 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MINV or VXUS?
MINV yields 0.97% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.