MNRS vs VTI
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MNRS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MNRS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $11M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +5.84% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.48% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 74.6% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Grayscale | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
MNRS vs VTI Performance
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) is a ETF from Grayscale and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MNRS returned +23.48% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, MNRS is up 5.84% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MNRS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 74.6% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.7% for MNRS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MNRS charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MNRS currently yields 0.47% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MNRS and VTI share 10 holdings out of 2803 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MNRS or VTI?
MNRS has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MNRS or VTI?
Over the past year MNRS returned +23.48% vs +22.43% for VTI, so MNRS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MNRS annualized +18.11% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MNRS or VTI?
MNRS has been the more volatile fund at 74.6% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MNRS -56.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MNRS and VTI?
MNRS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MNRS and VTI?
MNRS and VTI share 10 common holdings with a 4.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2803 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MNRS or VTI?
MNRS yields 0.47% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.