MNRS vs VTI
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MNRS or VTI?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MNRS led over the full window, VTI over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MNRS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $10M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 27 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +11.05% | +12.34%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.40% | +18.37%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.62% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.68% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 73.1% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -56.7% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $13,530Best | $12,724 |
| Fund Family | Grayscale | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 30, 2025 to Sep 9, 2026 (1.6 years).
MNRS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
MNRS vs VTI Performance
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) is an ETF from Grayscale and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MNRS returned +13.40% while VTI returned +18.37%. Year to date, MNRS is up 11.05% versus a gain of 12.34% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MNRS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 73.1% compared with 13.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.7% for MNRS and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MNRS charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MNRS currently yields 0.47% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 34.5% of MNRS's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in MNRS and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 27 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MNRS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 4.10% | 6.32% | 2.22% |
| SQBlock, Inc | 4.94% | 0.06% | 4.88% |
| CLSKCleanspark Inc.(Clsk) | 4.75% | 0.00% | 4.75% |
| RIOTRiot Blockchain Inc. | 4.56% | 0.01% | 4.55% |
| CIFRCipher Mining In | 4.46% | 0.01% | 4.45% |
| CORZCore Scientific | 4.39% | 0.01% | 4.38% |
| KEELKeel Infrastructure Corp. | 3.45% | 0.00% | 3.45% |
| GLXY:CAGalaxy Digital Inc-A | 2.74% | 0.00% | 2.74% |
| KULRKulr Tech. Grp. Inc | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.92% |
| EXODExodus Movement Inc | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.19% |
34.5% of MNRS is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MNRS or VTI?
MNRS has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MNRS or VTI?
Over the past year MNRS returned +13.40% vs +18.37% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MNRS annualized +20.80% vs +16.25% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MNRS or VTI?
MNRS has been the more volatile fund at 73.1% annualized versus 13.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MNRS -56.7% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both MNRS and VTI?
MNRS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MNRS and VTI?
At least 34.5% of MNRS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in MNRS and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, MNRS or VTI?
MNRS yields 0.47% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MNRS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MNRS led over the full window, VTI over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.