MNRS vs VOO
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, MNRS or VOO?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. MNRS led over the full window, VOO over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 67.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MNRS | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $10M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 27 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +11.05% | +12.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.40% | +18.60%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.98% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.76% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 73.1% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -56.7% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $13,530Best | $12,817 |
| Top 10 Weight | 67.3% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Grayscale | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 30, 2025 to Sep 9, 2026 (1.6 years).
MNRS vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
MNRS vs VOO Performance
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) is an ETF from Grayscale and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MNRS returned +13.40% while VOO returned +18.60%. Year to date, MNRS is up 11.05% versus a gain of 12.23% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MNRS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 73.1% compared with 13.0% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.7% for MNRS and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MNRS charges 0.59% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MNRS currently yields 0.47% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
9.0% of MNRS's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 7.6% of VOO's money is in holdings MNRS also owns.
MNRS and VOO share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in MNRS and 505 in VOO, against full books of 27 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 494 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for MNRS (91.9% of the fund), and 19 for MNRS that do not appear in VOO (67.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MNRS and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MNRS or VOO?
MNRS has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MNRS or VOO?
Over the past year MNRS returned +13.40% vs +18.60% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MNRS annualized +20.80% vs +16.78% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MNRS or VOO?
MNRS has been the more volatile fund at 73.1% annualized versus 13.0% for VOO. Worst drawdown: MNRS -56.7% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both MNRS and VOO?
MNRS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MNRS and VOO?
9.0% of MNRS's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 7.6% of VOO's is in holdings MNRS also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in MNRS and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, MNRS or VOO?
MNRS yields 0.47% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than MNRS?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. MNRS led over the full window, VOO over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 67.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.