MOTO vs VYM
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, MOTO or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. MOTO led over 1Y and the full window, VYM over 3Y and 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MOTO | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.91% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 39 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +14.53%Best | +14.33% |
| 1Y Return | +27.13%Best | +20.01% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.20% | +18.43%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.60% | +12.16%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.8% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -38.2% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,423 | $17,750Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.2% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | SmartETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 15, 2019 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 15, 2019 to Sep 8, 2026 (6.8 years).
MOTO vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.8 years both funds cover.
MOTO vs VYM Performance
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) is an ETF from SmartETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MOTO returned +27.13% while VYM returned +20.01%. Year to date, MOTO is up 14.53% versus a gain of 14.33% for VYM.
Over three years, MOTO compounded at +16.20% per year against +18.43% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +7.60% and +12.16% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, MOTO has the edge at +15.53% annualized vs +11.47%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MOTO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.8% compared with 15.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.2% for MOTO and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MOTO charges 0.68% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $4 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MOTO currently yields 0.91% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
23.8% of MOTO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 2.1% of VYM's money is in holdings MOTO also owns.
MOTO and VYM share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in MOTO and 602 in VYM, against full books of 39 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 561 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for MOTO (95.1% of the fund), and 11 for MOTO that do not appear in VYM (29.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MOTO | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 4.11% | 0.80% | 3.31% |
| ETNEaton Corp Plc | 3.63% | 0.69% | 2.94% |
| TELTyco Electronics Ltd. | 3.21% | 0.24% | 2.97% |
| NXPINxp Semiconductors N.V. Common Stock | 3.11% | 0.29% | 2.82% |
| STSensata Technologies Holding Plc | 3.17% | 0.03% | 3.14% |
| DANDana Inc | 3.16% | 0.01% | 3.15% |
| POWIPower Integrations Inc | 2.07% | 0.02% | 2.05% |
| SWKSSkyworks Solutions Inccommon Stock | 1.38% | 0.04% | 1.34% |
23.8% of MOTO is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MOTO or VYM?
MOTO has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $64 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MOTO or VYM?
Over the past year MOTO returned +27.13% vs +20.01% for VYM, so MOTO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), MOTO annualized +15.53% vs +11.47% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MOTO or VYM?
MOTO has been the more volatile fund at 24.8% annualized versus 15.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: MOTO -38.2% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both MOTO and VYM?
MOTO and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MOTO and VYM?
23.8% of MOTO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 2.1% of VYM's is in holdings MOTO also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in MOTO and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, MOTO or VYM?
MOTO yields 0.91% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than MOTO?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. MOTO led over 1Y and the full window, VYM over 3Y and 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.