MOTO vs QQQ
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. MOTO delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MOTO | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $10M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.91% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 36 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +14.17% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.86% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.46% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.86% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.2% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | SmartETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 15, 2019 | Mar 10, 1999 |
MOTO vs QQQ Performance
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) is a ETF from SmartETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MOTO returned +28.86% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, MOTO is up 14.17% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, MOTO compounded at +16.46% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +7.86% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, MOTO has the edge at +15.60% annualized vs +13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 24.9% for MOTO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.2% for MOTO and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MOTO charges 0.68% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $18 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MOTO currently yields 0.91% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
MOTO and QQQ share 5 holdings out of 135 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MOTO or QQQ?
MOTO has an expense ratio of 0.68% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $50 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MOTO or QQQ?
Over the past year MOTO returned +28.86% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so MOTO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), MOTO annualized +15.60% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MOTO or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 24.9% for MOTO. Worst drawdown: MOTO -38.2% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both MOTO and QQQ?
MOTO and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MOTO and QQQ?
MOTO and QQQ share 5 common holdings with a 10.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 135 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MOTO or QQQ?
MOTO yields 0.91% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so MOTO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.